Titlebook: Epistemology, Fieldwork, and Anthropology; Jean-Pierre Olivier Sardan Book 2015 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2015

后退

Dorsal-Kyphosis

Postface: Researcher and Citizen: Science and Ideology,ressed, in the course of this work, an ideal of . respect to the normative ideologies and judgments that I consider to be responsible for numerous interpretative distortions. These are, primarily, specific forms of ideology, namely scholarly ideologies. Clearly, they do not fall from the sky and are

Memorial

,The Methodological “I”: Implication and Explicitation in Fieldwork,tention to join a self-proclaimed epistemological revolution; sometimes it claims to be the expression of new methodological vigilance; sometimes it slips absentmindedly or systematically into the final writing up of a research report; sometimes it is in itself an object of reflection. Drawing inspi

迷住

受辱

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-79402-5is book is entirely devoted to the following argument: On the one hand, an anthropological or sociological text must be rigorous (or otherwise abandon its scientific claims). On the other hand, it belongs to the realm of approximation as the statements it makes can claim only to be .; they can never

ALTER

結(jié)合

歡騰

Ronald C. Blakey,Wayne D. Ranneyon of texts written in the first person testifies to the fact that author subjectivity is no longer discreditable. It now seems in good taste to make a discrete—and sometimes not so discrete— display of subjectivity. Field journals, researchers’ biographies and autobiographies, reflexivity, more or

Interregnum

The New Synthese Historical Librarythe people, the dominated, the poor, the deprived, and the excluded. “The populist effect” inspires numerous vocations in our field, lasts over time along professional careers, surfaces under various guises and may crop up in highly erudite statements.

Custodian