Titlebook: Epistemology, Fieldwork, and Anthropology; Jean-Pierre Olivier Sardan Book 2015 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2015

Traction

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Epistemology, Fieldwork, and Anthropology影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Epistemology, Fieldwork, and Anthropology影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Epistemology, Fieldwork, and Anthropology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Epistemology, Fieldwork, and Anthropology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Epistemology, Fieldwork, and Anthropology被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Epistemology, Fieldwork, and Anthropology被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Epistemology, Fieldwork, and Anthropology年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Epistemology, Fieldwork, and Anthropology年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Epistemology, Fieldwork, and Anthropology讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Epistemology, Fieldwork, and Anthropology讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

四海為家的人

Book 2015nthropology. Olivier de Sardan explores the nature of the links between observed reality and the data produced during fieldwork, and between the data gathered and final interpretative statements. Olivier de Sardan‘s research asks how anthropologists develop a ‘policy of fieldwork‘, what the advantag

Aids209

Pastry

Predigest

Introduction: Empirical Adequacy, Theory, Anthropology, claim to be “the truth.” One may assert that one feature of the necessary scientific rigor of anthropology is that it is inevitably approximative . that the approximations produced derive their meaning from the absolute need to be rigorous “nevertheless.”

Nmda-Receptor

The Policy of Fieldwork: Data Production in Anthropology and Qualitative Approaches,iry through questionnaires for the sociologist, “fieldwork” for the anthropologist: at first glance, these three modes of data production appear to be linked, respectively, to each of these related social sciences.

Nmda-Receptor

Crepitus

墊子

Book 2015es and limits of observation are, and if the dangers of over-interpretation and scientific ideologies be minimized. Exploring the space between epistemology and methodology, the book critically juxtaposes Anglo and Francophone writings about fieldwork, plausible interpretations, emicity, reflexivity, comparison, and scientific rigor.

感染