找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Doing the Best We Can; An Essay in Informal Fred Feldman Book 1986 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1986 Immanuel Kant.Indi

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: Reticent
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 00:45:16 | 只看該作者
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 02:32:20 | 只看該作者
The Stability Bias of Algorithms have thought that the welfare of a social group would more-or-less automatically be maximized if all the members of that group were to do their moral obligations.. We can say that any doctrine to this effect is a version of the “principle of moral harmony” (PMH).
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 06:07:21 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-3811-0Roughly, the idea is that something is obligatory if and only if it is the best of the possibilities. This idea appears in very simple guise in the popular maxim that “you ought to do the best you can”. Classic act utilitarianism is perhaps the most famous theoretical development of the idea. On tha
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 12:40:03 | 只看該作者
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 14:36:43 | 只看該作者
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 21:06:01 | 只看該作者
The Lives in Front of Interfaceseratives”. While some philosophers. have apparently used the term ‘hypothetical imperative’ as little more than a stylistic variant for ‘statement of conditional obligation’, I think there is good reason to distinguish hypothetical imperatives from other iffy oughts, and to give them a separate anal
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 00:38:35 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-3811-0everal different sorts of proposition. As I see it, this fact is responsible for one of the most serious defects in the literature concerning iffy oughts. We frequently find cases in which one writer, focussing on one sort of iffy ought, proposes an analysis. He claims to have given an account of “c
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 04:29:27 | 只看該作者
The Stability Bias of Algorithms have thought that the welfare of a social group would more-or-less automatically be maximized if all the members of that group were to do their moral obligations.. We can say that any doctrine to this effect is a version of the “principle of moral harmony” (PMH).
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 06:54:12 | 只看該作者
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 10:42:14 | 只看該作者
Biases Introduced by the Algorithm Itselfral obligation, individual prudential obligation, social obligation, and civic obligation. I have also introduced and discussed some forms of “collective” obligation — group moral and prudential obligation, for example. There is also the concept of the ought-to-be. Each of these is a “doing-the-best
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-27 09:35
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
略阳县| 固原市| 肇源县| 宾阳县| 阿坝县| 新余市| 台东市| 陕西省| 灌阳县| 通化市| 清水县| 晋城| 剑河县| 长岛县| 兴城市| 浦县| 庄浪县| 肥西县| 常德市| 巴东县| 宁明县| 赣州市| 金堂县| 青河县| 饶阳县| 开平市| 彭州市| 庄河市| 高安市| 成安县| 黄冈市| 鹤岗市| 长治市| 格尔木市| 揭西县| 沾益县| 延长县| 元氏县| 宜君县| 永丰县| 固始县|