Titlebook: Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?; Geoffrey S. Holtzman,Elisabeth Hildt Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 neuroet

conjunctivitis

品嘗你的人

Empirische Transformationsforschungretributive and consequentialist. In general, retributivist considerations are backward-looking and thus justify punishment in terms of “just deserts.” By contrast, consequentialist considerations are forward-looking and thus justify punishment in terms of its good effects. This chapter contends tha

TERRA

獨輪車

Means of Production in Agriculturea moral view in an evidence free manner seems both morally and epistemically vicious. But failing to muster an empirically informed moral view is only one way to err regarding the relationship between empirical facts and moral norms. We might also make the mistake of . on facts when engaging moral q

碎石

FOR

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96674-4 neuroscience and ethics and specifies three possible ways (solving ethical issues in specific contexts, developing normative standards that can be used to regulate and evaluate the behaviors of a group of individuals with particular cognitive abilities or disabilities, and identifying and correctin

Concrete

帶來的感覺

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56134-5neuroethics; normative implications; neuroscience; prosocial behavior; mind perception and morality; mora

Pamphlet

FEAS

Geoffrey S. Holtzman,Elisabeth HildtThe only collection dedicated exclusively to essays addressing the implications of neuroscience for philosophical ethics.Brings together the philosophical subdisciplines of ethics and philosophy of co