Titlebook: Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?; Geoffrey S. Holtzman,Elisabeth Hildt Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 neuroet

監(jiān)管

書目名稱Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?被引頻次




書目名稱Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?年度引用




書目名稱Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?讀者反饋




書目名稱Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

FEAT

寡頭政治

Endearing

Two Theories of Moral Cognition,tists have turned to reinforcement learning, a branch of machine learning, to develop formal, mathematical models of normative cognition. One prominent approach, proposed by Cushman (Curr Opin Behav Sci 3:58–62, 2015), suggests that moral cognition is underwritten by a habitual (‘model-free’) system

搜尋

Rethinking Moral Motivation: How Neuroscience Supports an Alternative to Motivation Internalism,uch recent discussion focuses on the dispute between ., who hold that there is a necessary connection between moral judgment and motivation, and ., who deny this. In contrast, I argue that this relation is best seen as a . one: moral judgment . to be accompanied by the appropriate motivation. I supp

權(quán)宜之計(jì)

權(quán)宜之計(jì)

,Normative Implications of Neuroscience and Sociobiology – Intended and Perceived,ic “nature-nurture” debates, including the sociobiology controversy around Harvard biologist E. O. Wilson. Neuroscience is the field that Wilson hoped would continue his work in . (Wilson, Sociobiology: The new synthesis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, .)?in regard to finding an evolutiona

Flawless

Nervous Norms,a moral view in an evidence free manner seems both morally and epistemically vicious. But failing to muster an empirically informed moral view is only one way to err regarding the relationship between empirical facts and moral norms. We might also make the mistake of . on facts when engaging moral q

立即

judiciousness

Autistic Moral Agency and Integrative Neuroethics, neuroscience and ethics and specifies three possible ways (solving ethical issues in specific contexts, developing normative standards that can be used to regulate and evaluate the behaviors of a group of individuals with particular cognitive abilities or disabilities, and identifying and correctin