Titlebook: Dimensions of Practical Necessity; “Here I Stand. I Can Katharina Bauer,Somogy Varga,Corinna Mieth Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable)

Grandstand

忘恩負義的人

Vice, Practical Necessity, and Agential Self-Destructionextent, aspiring to virtue involves striving to acquire cognitive and motivational dispositions by which certain ways of acting become practically necessary. Vices can practically disable an agent for acting well, on account of motivational and cognitive dispositions shaping necessities and impossib

意見一致

Three Ways to Understand Practical Necessity and ,: Aristotle, Davidson, and Frankfurttotle provides us with a theoretical framework that is powerful enough to understand both the nature of practical necessity and the possibility of akratic agency—the latter being the most extreme opposite of practical necessity. Her chapter has two aims. First, it shows how Aristotle’s account of a

mighty

細查

Where? Me? Indeterminacy and Ambiguity in Human Motivationedom implied by his own authority over his actions) and his being radically constrained (he is thoroughly aware of the fact that there is really merely one course of action open to him). To dissolve this paradox, Jan Bransen explores the commonly neglected import of the indexical mode of presenting

syring

Shame and Necessity , of taking the third-person perspective on oneself and one’s actions to practical necessity. She illustrates the importance of shame in our lives with others using a population in which emotional connection appears to be absent: psychopaths. Psychopaths lack the ability to view themselves as others

濕潤

Here I Stand: About the Weight of Personal Practical Necessity all odds. The incapacity of alternative action is not regarded as a deficit; in such cases, it seems to “l(fā)end some added weight” to the decision. This chapter deals with the question what kind of value is attributed to experiences of practical necessities or incapacities, in particular, if these de

Pander

Morality and Happiness: Two Precarious Situations?nna Mieth scrutinizes several influential proposals of how to understand this relationship. First, she sketches four general ways of relating morality and happiness: The identity thesis, the harmony thesis, the dissonance thesis, and the incompatibility thesis. In the second step, she discusses how

patriot

INTER

Ground Enterprise Transformation at NESDIScy are dynamic and are co-determined by the intersubjective background conditions implicitly shared by the agent and his—real or anticipated—audience. Taking this into account allows us to give an interesting twist to the role of love in understanding the practical necessities that are part and parcel of the finite human beings we are.