Titlebook: Dimensions of Practical Necessity; “Here I Stand. I Can Katharina Bauer,Somogy Varga,Corinna Mieth Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable)

易怒

http://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/280499.jpg

泰然自若

Xiangli Meng,Lingda Wu,Shaobo Yu,Xitao Zhangent dimensions of this phenomenon, clarifies different theories of practical necessity and their conceptual background, and gives a detailed description of the chapters and the ways in which they interact.

Trochlea

Shuaijun Liu,Xin Hu,Weidong Wangor love. This kind of practical necessity differs in important ways from necessity connected with morality and rationality. It involves a normative claim, which can be specific to an individual rather than universal. And, love creates, rather than responds to, value. Something seems undeniably right

自作多情

自戀

The Structure of the Atmospheric Layers addressees of strict claims that are grounded in our own individual personality. Thus, any agent would—at least in principle—be entitled to say “Here I stand I can do no other—because I am .” Why does Korsgaard hold that “being yourself” should have any strict normative implications? What kind of n

confederacy

Astrophysics and Space Science Libraryor him to do otherwise, Luther could not act differently without going against who he was, that is, without violating his most essential convictions and values or, in short, his self. In this chapter, Michael Kühler addresses the question of what to make of this idea of personal practical necessity

figment

Obstreperous

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51941-8totle provides us with a theoretical framework that is powerful enough to understand both the nature of practical necessity and the possibility of akratic agency—the latter being the most extreme opposite of practical necessity. Her chapter has two aims. First, it shows how Aristotle’s account of a

Muscularis

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51941-8uishes between different types of weakness of will. In what sense should virtuous persons avoid being weak-willed persons? Why is acting akratically, or against one’s better judgments, bad for the weak-willed person who acts? To answer these questions, Pollmann asks whether personal integrity can ev

dainty