Titlebook: Democracy and Deterrence; Philip Bobbitt Book 1988 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1988 defence.democracy.i

摻和

要求比…更好

責任

MUTE

Conclusionan individual who must make particular choices in the decisions in his daily life. What is right and wrong for a society constitutes a different inquiry from the questions of right and wrong for the individual. Few of us deny that to preserve its national security in a war, a society may legitimatel

muster

Massive Retaliationst would not be seriously impaired’. The Committee concluded that planned air attacks alone would not ‘destroy the roots of Communism, or critically weaken the power of Soviet leadership to dominate the people’.. A strategic air offensive against urban industrial targets could not promise ‘victory’

碌碌之人

Assured Destruction and Strategic Sufficiencyking US cities by the US threat to destroy Russian cities. With Damage Limitation the US tried to protect US cities by means other than simply threatening Russian cities and sought the goals of counterforce targeting while loudly abjuring first strike intentions.

In-Situ

Alternative Nuclear Strategiested that a levelling off would occur once a secure, assured destruction capability was gained. They were perhaps persuaded that there were no significant implications for deterrence in the margin between this capability and full parity anyway.

雄偉

Multipolarityose theatres where the political culture makes the operation of the theorem strategically significant, since it is the effort to maintain extended deterrence that engages the theorem in the first place.

手銬

朝圣者