Titlebook: Corporate Capitalism‘s Use of Openness; Profit for Free? Arwid Lund,Mariano Zukerfeld Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Autho

flutter

大約冬季

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28219-6collaborative prosumer; peer producer; wikinomics; unpaid labour; commercial crowdsourcing; open access

現(xiàn)暈光

978-3-030-28221-9The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl

尖牙

Hectic

obnoxious

Robust UAV Communications with Jammingtalism or informational capitalism. Some instead speak of a movement within capitalism from Fordism to post-Fordism that has changed capital’s regime of accumulation and the regulation of the capitalist system, transforming its reproduction. The profit from openness model, introduced in Chap. 1, eme

等級(jí)的上升

Expand

Yun Zhang,Xin Qi,Lupeng Guo,Nan Qiaomic publishers’ exploitation. On top of that, Elsevier and other commercial academic publishers are prospering from research that is paid for by someone else, and that someone else (often the public) is in most cases paying the companies to publish the research. This is profit for free at its prime.

一個(gè)攪動(dòng)不安

Guiting Li,Xuan Zhang,Junyu Guo,Qi Yangt from openness business model. YouTube, our case study, leads this segment by any measure, but is also the second largest Internet site by traffic. As of January 2019, YouTube had 1.9 billion monthly active users worldwide, watching some 5 billion videos each day. The videos are uploaded by around

Initial

Guiting Li,Xuan Zhang,Junyu Guo,Qi Yang the 11,400 courses offered by these platforms. While there are several not-for-profit MOOCs, many of them are aimed at making money, and Coursera, our case study, is the leader of the pack. The company currently has some 37 million learners and made roughly USD 140 million in revenues in 2018. Reve