Titlebook: Conflict, Co-operation and the Rhetoric of Coalition Government; Judi Atkins Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 201

滲透

,?ffentliche Meinung und Akzeptanz,t of fairness, which had served them well in 2010 but lacked conviction after five years of austerity. As they could no longer be a ‘party of protest’, the Liberal Democrats sought to demonstrate governing competence through a strategy of equidistance. This decision cost them their electoral distinctiveness, and so further diminished their appeal.

最高峰

Conflict, Co-operation and the Rhetoric of Coalition Government978-1-137-31796-4Series ISSN 2947-5147 Series E-ISSN 2947-5155

Indict

Judi AtkinsExamines how parties in a coalition government use rhetoric to display unity while preserving their disctinct identities.Reflects on the legacy of the Conservative-Lib Dem coalition in the key policy

addict

激怒

famine

Licentious

NAVEN

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596337shortly after the formation of the Coalition. The first section outlines the parties’ manifesto pledges in the areas of higher education, constitutional reform, Europe and foreign policy. In doing so it highlights the points of overlap and division, and considers how these were resolved in the Coali

Affiliation

Transgender in the Historical Imagination,to justify their change of position, the Party used interpersonal identification to foster understanding and win back trust. While this reflected their consensual approach to politics, it perhaps was perceived as ingratiating by the public. The parliamentary debate on the reforms was dominated by id

配偶

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8282-8ternative Vote (AV). The chapter examines the parliamentary debate on these reforms, showing that both sides employed different definitions of ‘fairness’ to foster ideological identification. This concept also dominated Cameron’s case against AV in a bitter referendum campaign, and the ensuing frict