Titlebook: Conflict, Co-operation and the Rhetoric of Coalition Government; Judi Atkins Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 201

Radiofrequency

書目名稱Conflict, Co-operation and the Rhetoric of Coalition Government影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Conflict, Co-operation and the Rhetoric of Coalition Government影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Conflict, Co-operation and the Rhetoric of Coalition Government網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Conflict, Co-operation and the Rhetoric of Coalition Government網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱Conflict, Co-operation and the Rhetoric of Coalition Government被引頻次




書目名稱Conflict, Co-operation and the Rhetoric of Coalition Government被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Conflict, Co-operation and the Rhetoric of Coalition Government年度引用




書目名稱Conflict, Co-operation and the Rhetoric of Coalition Government年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Conflict, Co-operation and the Rhetoric of Coalition Government讀者反饋




書目名稱Conflict, Co-operation and the Rhetoric of Coalition Government讀者反饋學科排名

心神不寧

Inordinate

2947-5147 acy of the Conservative-Lib Dem coalition in the key policy .Through a rhetorical analysis, this book explores how the parties in a coalition government create a united public front while preserving their distinct identities. After proposing an original framework based on the ‘new rhetoric’ of Kenne

Blood-Vessels

SOBER

Coalition Termination: The 2015 General Election Campaign,t of fairness, which had served them well in 2010 but lacked conviction after five years of austerity. As they could no longer be a ‘party of protest’, the Liberal Democrats sought to demonstrate governing competence through a strategy of equidistance. This decision cost them their electoral distinctiveness, and so further diminished their appeal.

情感脆弱

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596337responsibility to foster ideological identification. The partners also appealed to the ‘national interest’ to quell intra-party dissent, and they employed identification through antithesis to unite their audience against the ‘fiscally irresponsible’ Labour Party.

情感脆弱

BINGE

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8282-8erent interpretations of the Coalition Agreement, which were shaped by their perceived interests. Consequently, Liberal Democrats could justify their decision to back the postponement of the boundary review, which angered the Conservatives but allowed the junior partner to reassert its distinctiveness.

拘留

ALLAY

,Hintergrund, Begriffskl?rungen und Aufbau,oalition’s case for intervention resembled that of Blair in several important respects, notably the bypassing of the UN. This prevented the partners from creating a clear contrast between Iraq and Syria, and so undermined their efforts to foster identification through antithesis.