Titlebook: Conceptual Change; Glenn Pearce,Patrick Maynard Book 1973 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1973 Hilary Putnam.bibliography

overreach

合適

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72098-7od of criticizing scientific theories was falsification; (the disagreements were over what positive things could be said about theories which survived testing). Then Kuhn (1962) discovered normal science and Agassi (1966) argued that Boyle’s Rule was dogmatic (why should one always keep the experime

大量殺死

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-09045-8f Science, and in the other of which (the first half) he sketches elements of an alternative theory of his own. I shall comment only on Putnam’s theory, ignoring his attack on positivism. In thus taking advantage of the fact that philosophical positions tend to be relatively hard to defend and relat

Canvas

Total Quality Management im Krankenhausense that once the phonology, syntax and semantics are given, that constitutes a sufficient characterization or definition of the language. Here we shall be concerned, for the most part, with the question: How does one give the semantics of a language? I shall argue that even if there were meanings,

珊瑚

Synthese Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/234969.jpg

克制

Something about Conceptual Schemes,of communication. Contrariwise, a choice grimace can sometimes suffice to convey even a subtle suggestion. Not prolixity however but an aspect of the etiology of ununderstanding is our immediate concern.

Obloquy

空洞

Carcinoma

Logic and Conceptual Change,tructure; to a distinction between its various aspects and to the manner in which they may suffer or resist modification; and lastly to a brief consideration of the causes of conceptual change. The remarks made in the first part of this essay will then in its second part be exemplified by, and applied to, logic..

Brain-Waves