Titlebook: Conceptual Change; Glenn Pearce,Patrick Maynard Book 1973 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1973 Hilary Putnam.bibliography

他去就結(jié)束

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72098-7ch everything is simple. The view that theoretical change is all of one kind is an invariant through otherwise conflicting positions. It seems clear, then, that this traditional view should be rejected.

西瓜

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-09045-8ively easy to attack, I shall be attempting to make things relatively easy for myself and hard for Professor Putnam. First, let me outline briefly what I take to be the main tenets of Putnam’s position.

Obsessed

細微差別

罵人有污點

0166-6991 - tario. The general topic of the sessions that year was conceptual change. The thirteen papers composing this volume stem more or less directly from those meetings; six of them are printed here virtually as delivered, while the remaining seven were subsequently written by invitation. The programme

concise

嘲笑

Daniel J. McCarthy,Robert A. Millenerms in our laws and theories.. However, what statements we countenance as evidence may be altered whether or not conceptual change alters the meaning of words. Our main purpose in this paper is to formulate a theory of evidence explaining how conceptual change alters, not only what we infer from evidence, but the very content of evidence itself.

Incorporate

Conceptual Structures,ch everything is simple. The view that theoretical change is all of one kind is an invariant through otherwise conflicting positions. It seems clear, then, that this traditional view should be rejected.

多嘴

harrow