Titlebook: Communicating for Change; Concepts to Think Wi Jo Tacchi,Thomas Tufte Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under excl

irritants

書目名稱Communicating for Change影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Communicating for Change影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Communicating for Change網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Communicating for Change網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Communicating for Change被引頻次




書目名稱Communicating for Change被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Communicating for Change年度引用




書目名稱Communicating for Change年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Communicating for Change讀者反饋




書目名稱Communicating for Change讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Fermentation

Jo Tacchi,Thomas TufteExplores fresh concepts that provide entry-points to the field of communication for development and social change.Thinks across approaches and contexts to offer interdisciplinary conceptual reflection

混沌

Palgrave Studies in Communication for Social Changehttp://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/230373.jpg

Grating

,Nature·Humanity·Soul Porcelain·Ganzi,t and social change. We explain the reasons for wanting to develop and share a set of concepts that contribute to this field. The intention is to present thought-provoking concepts, stripped of much of the justifications and qualifications required in other academic publishing formats, to get straig

CHASM

CROW

CROW

S. K. Michael Wong,Y. Y. Yao,Cory J. Butzent and/or social change. Returning to Nora Quebral’s (2006, .(1), 100–107, originally published in 1971) intention to coin a phrase (‘development communication’) that would emphasise the goal (development) rather than the means (communication), this chapter proposes ‘communicative development’ as a

祝賀

Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computingmed and engaged decision-making, building on critical approaches to research and on dialogic approaches to listening and learning, understanding the value of voice. Advocacy in this framework references a comprehensive and critical approach to inquiry. Advocating with accountability for social justi

forthy

Soft Computing in Information Retrieval of more complex, emergent, processual, and intangible outcomes. Excessive focus on tangible effects betrays an unshakeable belief in the rationality of purposive social action. The demand for tangible outcomes arises from an institutional matrix (‘a(chǎn) regime of power’) feeding off targets, benchmarks

法官