Titlebook: Closing the Justice Gap for Adult and Child Sexual Assault; Rethinking the Adver Anne Cossins Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and T

公豬

僵硬

Anne CossinsPresents decades of research including the 2019 NSW Law Reform Commission report.First book of its kind to examine key reform issues associated with trial processes specifically.Appeals to academics,

富饒

STING

textile

,‘Commonsense’ or ‘Life Experience’: Jurors’ Perceptions of Guilt, is an element of the offence, the defendant committed the sexual act but did so with the complainant’s consent; or (iii) the defendant had a mistaken but honest belief in consent (see further Chapter .).

扔掉掐死你

,‘No Means Yes and Yes Means Anal’: The Cultural Climate in Which Sex Offences Are Prosecuted,normative activity, sex, in a cultural climate where movies, television, social media, advertisements, video games and pornography regularly depict consensual sexual encounters that involve coercion or force, often reinforcing male aggression and female passivity.

漫不經(jīng)心

Cross-Examination in Sexual Assault Trials: Evidentiary Safeguard or an Opportunity to Confuse?,xamination, a process considered to be fundamental for ensuring that the defendant receives a fair trial (see, for example, Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights [ECHR]) because of its utility for testing a witness’s veracity.

侵害

Contemporary Reforms to Cross-Examination,that favours the defence case. The question is whether it is in the public interest for jurors to make decisions based on manufactured inaccuracies, particularly since studies show that cross-examination which confirms pre-existing beliefs on the part of jurors will influence jury decision-making.

Chameleon

Ulrich Kück,Minou Nowrousian,Ines Enghbecause ‘hard evidence’ is usually lacking in sexual assault trials, it can be expected that jurors will rely on extra-legal factors (myths, biases and misconceptions) in deciding a case with ambiguous evidence such as a word-against-word case.

不吉祥的女人