Titlebook: Children‘s Rights from Below; Cross-Cultural Persp Manfred Liebel,Karl Hanson,Wouter Vandenhole Book 2012 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of

CAMP

Children’s Rights as ‘Work in Progress’: The Conceptual and Practical Contributions of Working Childic debate about rights’ (ibid.: 32), still largely confine their description of social and political struggles revolving around children’s rights to the actions of NGOs and other adult actors. While we agree with the assessment that ‘poor children and migrants […] are among the most marginalized and

轎車

Cultural Variations in Constructions of Children’s Participationism or missionary practices (see examples in Johnson et al., 1998). In this chapter, we will try to disentangle such controversies and to contribute to an awareness of the wide diversity of conceptions and practices related to the participation of children throughout the world. We take two premises

ABOUT

The Role of Children in Shaping New Contexts of Children’s RightsTheir lesser ‘weight’ as typically seen characteristic of children is, itself, an expression of the social power relations, which are to be faced by the acknowledgement and ‘equality’ of children as subjects. Children’s rights can help to bring about this change.

Consensus

奇怪

Book 2012This book presents an integral, cross-cultural reflection on the social reality of children‘s rights and citizenship, giving an insight into new perspectives on the history and different concepts of children‘s rights in a contextualized and localized manner.

Encumber

Recess

尊重

ineffectual

2731-6467 Overview: This book presents an integral, cross-cultural reflection on the social reality of children‘s rights and citizenship, giving an insight into new perspectives on the history and different concepts of children‘s rights in a contextualized and localized manner.978-1-349-33755-2978-0-230-36184-3Series ISSN 2731-6467 Series E-ISSN 2731-6475

專橫

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137493569 need the support of adults to do so and how they can make a claim to such support. We are not interested in revisiting the controversial philosophical and legal debates about whether children can or should actually have rights or whether it makes sense to grant them specific rights.. Our intention