Titlebook: Chaucerian Ecopoetics; Deconstructing Anthr Shawn Normandin Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 Geoffrey Chaucer

antedate

Book 2018 the aesthetic charm of his narratives and calls into question the anthropocentrism they often depict. This text combines ecocriticism with reading techniques associated with deconstruction, to provide innovative interpretations of the General Prologue, the Knight‘s Tale, the Miller‘s Tale, the Reev

Offset

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-0034-5male subject can abstain from these tropes. The Reeve, by contrast, presents metaphorical delusions as unavoidable consequences of human embeddedness in a more-than-human world whose most powerful agent is the sun.

climax

Formatting Logging Information in log4j,pite appearances, the Franklin does not entirely void the power of rocks: in the monetary and renunciatory transactions that occupy the end of the tale, minerals continue to influence human speech and behavior.

最高點

浸軟

瑪瑙

Iterability, Anthropocentrism, and the ,pite appearances, the Franklin does not entirely void the power of rocks: in the monetary and renunciatory transactions that occupy the end of the tale, minerals continue to influence human speech and behavior.

煩人

The Unnatural Personifications of the ,irginity’s paradoxical status in medieval culture as something both natural and unnatural. This chapter draws support from Paul de Man’s theories of allegory and from Jacques Derrida’s identification of poetry with an urge to memorize.

Schlemms-Canal

閃光東本

Ecophobia and the ,agines humankind forever endangered by bestial chaos. Yet while Chaucer aggravates the luridness of his main source, Boccaccio’s ., he also emphasizes the artificiality of the Knight’s storytelling. The artificiality renders the tale’s ecophobia ironic. A close reading reveals that fear of nonhumans

frenzy