Titlebook: Chaucerian Ecopoetics; Deconstructing Anthr Shawn Normandin Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 Geoffrey Chaucer

底的根除

書目名稱Chaucerian Ecopoetics影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Chaucerian Ecopoetics影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Chaucerian Ecopoetics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Chaucerian Ecopoetics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Chaucerian Ecopoetics被引頻次




書目名稱Chaucerian Ecopoetics被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Chaucerian Ecopoetics年度引用




書目名稱Chaucerian Ecopoetics年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Chaucerian Ecopoetics讀者反饋




書目名稱Chaucerian Ecopoetics讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

conservative

Chaucerian Ecopoetics978-3-319-90457-3Series ISSN 2945-5936 Series E-ISSN 2945-5944

無畏

integrated

CAMP

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90457-3Geoffrey Chaucer; The Canterbury Tales; ecocriticism; ecopoetics; literature and the environment; environ

ELUC

ELUC

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-0034-5s. Chaucer often shifts his focus from nonhuman to human worlds, but this movement destabilizes his representations of humanity and shows how humanity is dependent on nonhumans. Humans’ compromised autonomy reveals itself in language, the supposed guarantor of their difference from nonhumans. This c

Infect

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-0034-5agines humankind forever endangered by bestial chaos. Yet while Chaucer aggravates the luridness of his main source, Boccaccio’s ., he also emphasizes the artificiality of the Knight’s storytelling. The artificiality renders the tale’s ecophobia ironic. A close reading reveals that fear of nonhumans

FAST

種子