Titlebook: Changes in Innovation; Towards an Improved Jani Saarinen (innovation and technology policy ma Book 2009 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of

變化無常

Changes in Innovationitself to this new situation, in order to achieve an equilibrium. After some major advances made by such as Joseph Schumpeter in the area of technological development, innovations and industrial dynamics, technology was drawn inside the system and handled as something endogenous.

Glossy

Framing Elements of Service Innovationturing sectors. First, many manufacturing firms regard the provision of services as a key growth area for their businesses nowadays. Second, the importance of knowledge-intensive service activities has been found to be significant in industrial development (Hipp and Grupp, 2005; Leiponen, 2001; OECD, 2006; Tomlinson, 1997).

修飾

Hypothetical Standard Screening Bioassays,n the chapters of this book, the main source of innovation data has been the database of Finnish innovations, namely SFINNO. The database is developed, constructed and maintained by VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland.

爵士樂

利用

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22098-3d with help of some proxies (like patents, R&D investments, etc.). Characteristics of innovations and innovation processes have not been taken more systematically into account when new policies are planned and executed.

chlorosis

Hypothetical Soil-Culture System Sub-Models,urgelman and Sayles, 1986). Greve and Taylor (2000) mention innovation as a ‘competitive weapon’ to get new resources and competences when radically new product introductions undermine the incumbent technological regime.

decode

Innovation as Objective: The SFINNO Approachn the chapters of this book, the main source of innovation data has been the database of Finnish innovations, namely SFINNO. The database is developed, constructed and maintained by VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland.

試驗(yàn)

Professionalization of Research and Development Activities in Finnish Companies before the 1970she Finnish GDP, while the corresponding figure in more advanced countries was well over 1 per cent and over 2 per cent in the USA and UK (T?rnudd, 1958). By the mid-1960s, R&D expenses had doubled to 0.4 per cent but were still at a low level in international terms (Finnish Government, 1974).

SEMI

廢墟

When the Going Gets Tough: Failure of Innovative Businessesurgelman and Sayles, 1986). Greve and Taylor (2000) mention innovation as a ‘competitive weapon’ to get new resources and competences when radically new product introductions undermine the incumbent technological regime.