找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Casualties of Causality; Peter Dahler-Larsen Book 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022 Resea

[復制鏈接]
樓主: BRISK
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 12:07:49 | 只看該作者
Twenty-five Questions,de: Is causation the most important and honorable task in the social sciences? Is causality only one thing? Will social science cleanse itself of ideology and normativity, if it restricts itself to causal analysis? Does causation always require a counterfactual? Can you sell your study by pretending
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 16:03:41 | 只看該作者
Casualties of Causality and Paths to the Future,e Causality Syndrome include lack of truthfulness about details, which constitute threats to the validity of causal claims. Another problem is lack of attention to what exactly constitutes the difference between an intervention group and a control group. In a broader perspective, a too strong focus
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 18:06:06 | 只看該作者
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 22:18:51 | 只看該作者
Sound Wave Reflection from the Ocean Floor,logy and normativity, if it restricts itself to causal analysis? Does causation always require a counterfactual? Can you sell your study by pretending that its design is better than it actually is? Well-reflected answers to these questions may lead to a revision of one’s position vis-à-vis The Causality Syndrome.
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 04:21:47 | 只看該作者
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 07:41:53 | 只看該作者
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 11:46:24 | 只看該作者
Casualties of Causality and Paths to the Future, attention to what exactly constitutes the difference between an intervention group and a control group. In a broader perspective, a too strong focus on causation may lead to a bias in the selection of topics for research. The chapter suggests three paths to the future.
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 17:34:22 | 只看該作者
Book 2022 causal studies as more important than other studies, a narrow definition of causality, and rules of thumb regarding how to make causal claims. The book argues that the present dominance of this syndrome has considerable downsides and presents a challenge to social science. The book dissects the man
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 20:53:24 | 只看該作者
The Causality Syndrome,f thought and controversy between the positions. However, when fast and less reflexive thinking reigns, then monism, usurpation, simplification and institutionalization lead to the present dominance of The Causality Syndrome.
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 01:59:55 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-10 23:24
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
江安县| 东安县| 大足县| 泸水县| 汉中市| 边坝县| 墨玉县| 肃宁县| 海安县| 彭阳县| 蓝山县| 泗水县| 中西区| 灌阳县| 潜山县| 巴楚县| 曲阜市| 双辽市| 盐山县| 肥城市| 宣汉县| 宁安市| 城口县| 定西市| 凌海市| 师宗县| 宝应县| 文登市| 共和县| 神池县| 泉州市| 上林县| 南和县| 鸡西市| 揭西县| 元阳县| 玉树县| 和林格尔县| 会理县| 武义县| 德州市|