找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Casualties of Causality; Peter Dahler-Larsen Book 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022 Resea

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 21474|回復(fù): 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:02:50 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Casualties of Causality
編輯Peter Dahler-Larsen
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/223/222401/222401.mp4
概述Challenges the view on causality as a key concept in social science.Focusses on research practices rather than on classical discussions of the philosophy of science.Contains 25 questions relevant for
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Casualties of Causality;  Peter Dahler-Larsen Book 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022 Resea
描述This book offers a critique of the present status of the concept of causality in the social sciences. “The Causality Syndrome” consists of a belief in causal studies as more important than other studies, a narrow definition of causality, and rules of thumb regarding how to make causal claims. The book argues that the present dominance of this syndrome has considerable downsides and presents a challenge to social science. The book dissects the many interconnected ideas which undergird this syndrome and offers an intellectual home for advanced students, researchers and others who are concerned about the present dominance of The Causality Syndrome.?.The book critically discusses whether “causality” deserves the central position in social science that its advocates desire. The text shows how methodological rules about causal inference are used to protect causal studies from critique, even in situations where these rules are not followed. It is arguedthat institutionalization of these rules as symbols of good and trustworthy social science is highly problematic and comes with a price. One of the casualties of causality is that there is less motivation to study complex and pressing issue
出版日期Book 2022
關(guān)鍵詞Research methodology; Social science research; Causality; Theorists; Sociology theory
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18246-4
isbn_ebook978-3-031-18246-4
copyrightThe Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Casualties of Causality影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Casualties of Causality影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Casualties of Causality網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Casualties of Causality網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Casualties of Causality被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Casualties of Causality被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Casualties of Causality年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Casualties of Causality年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Casualties of Causality讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Casualties of Causality讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶(hù)組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:52:07 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:51:35 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18246-4Research methodology; Social science research; Causality; Theorists; Sociology theory
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:36:17 | 只看該作者
The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:19:01 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:17:17 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:38:39 | 只看該作者
Warshi S. Dandeniya,Serena Cauccie Causality Syndrome include lack of truthfulness about details, which constitute threats to the validity of causal claims. Another problem is lack of attention to what exactly constitutes the difference between an intervention group and a control group. In a broader perspective, a too strong focus
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:09:58 | 只看該作者
hese rules as symbols of good and trustworthy social science is highly problematic and comes with a price. One of the casualties of causality is that there is less motivation to study complex and pressing issue978-3-031-18246-4
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:14:57 | 只看該作者
Book 2022 situations where these rules are not followed. It is arguedthat institutionalization of these rules as symbols of good and trustworthy social science is highly problematic and comes with a price. One of the casualties of causality is that there is less motivation to study complex and pressing issue
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:09:54 | 只看該作者
The Causality Syndrome,ief in causal studies as more important than other studies, a narrow definition of causality, and formulaic rules of thumb regarding how to make causal claims. The concept of causality as such is not the problem. When social scientists discuss causality in a careful way, there are multiple schools o
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-10 23:25
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
三穗县| 宝坻区| 聊城市| 梨树县| 绍兴市| 东宁县| 冷水江市| 漳浦县| 闸北区| 克拉玛依市| 兴化市| 台州市| 文昌市| 花莲县| 淮北市| 巫溪县| 巴马| 抚松县| 舞钢市| 安宁市| 花莲县| 岐山县| 兴和县| 沙坪坝区| 都昌县| 九龙坡区| 如皋市| 江山市| 涞水县| 全椒县| 丰镇市| 永登县| 富宁县| 工布江达县| 海原县| 桃园县| 阿克苏市| 辽宁省| 武定县| 汉川市| 怀化市|