找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: British Media Coverage of the Press Reform Debate; Journalists Reportin Binakuromo Ogbebor Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable)

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 臉紅
41#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 17:01:32 | 只看該作者
Linking Historical and Maritime Archaeology,the UK as a way of highlighting recurrent trends in efforts at reforming press regulation and the outcomes of such attempts. To this end, this chapter discusses the history of press regulation in Britain, the British press system (introducing the three major newspaper classifications—broadsheets, mi
42#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 19:49:13 | 只看該作者
43#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 23:35:21 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-33600-1the . phone hacking scandal and the Leveson Inquiry. A total of 870 news articles on the media reform debate from six British national newspapers were examined. Based on her findings, the author argues that the public needs to play a greater and more pragmatic role in ensuring press accountability.
44#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 06:14:43 | 只看該作者
Linking Historical and Maritime Archaeology, to efforts by the press to protect news paradigms rather than critically examining them to see if there is a need for change (Bennet et al. 1985, cited in Carlson, Metajournalistic discourse and the meanings of journalism: Definitional control, boundary work, and legitimation. .(4), 349–368, 2015,
45#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 10:31:12 | 只看該作者
46#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 13:09:42 | 只看該作者
47#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 17:01:56 | 只看該作者
Models of Container Port Security,y. Using content analysis, critical discourse analysis and a theoretical framework that consists of the public sphere concept and the gatekeeping theory, this chapter reveals that the coverage of the press reform debate was characterised by a doubly narrow spectrum of sources. It also found that the
48#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 23:19:44 | 只看該作者
49#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 02:02:07 | 只看該作者
,Gr??enentwicklung der Containerschiffe,n serve as a democratic public sphere where diverse voices can have proportionate access to the press reform debate, the media used their gatekeeping powers to advance their views while limiting or preventing arguments that were against their self-interest from gaining entrance into the public spher
50#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 07:27:17 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37265-1Leveson Inquiry; News of the World; Phone hacking; Phone hacking scandal; Media policy; Media and democra
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-18 01:49
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
神木县| 大冶市| 达拉特旗| 常州市| 阳谷县| 兴义市| 焦作市| 姜堰市| 蓝田县| 富阳市| 江油市| 余江县| 宜宾市| 土默特右旗| 四子王旗| 乐昌市| 天峨县| 景洪市| 清苑县| 菏泽市| 曲麻莱县| 尚义县| 云梦县| 丰县| 绵竹市| 陇南市| 丹阳市| 县级市| 巍山| 修武县| 平远县| 双桥区| 阿拉善左旗| 福海县| 丹凤县| 安多县| 来凤县| 嘉荫县| 龙海市| 青冈县| 如东县|