找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: British Media Coverage of the Press Reform Debate; Journalists Reportin Binakuromo Ogbebor Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable)

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 臉紅
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 06:31:35 | 只看該作者
Media Policy, Democracy and Theories of the Press,a policy. The concepts of the public sphere and “Journalism as an interpretive community” are expounded to show that in debates about their profession, the press can function not only as an interpretive community, but also as multiple homogeneous publics and individual unique voices.
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 09:28:15 | 只看該作者
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 13:22:56 | 只看該作者
Paradigm Repair: Bad Apples and Self-Assertion,eir coverage of media policy debates. It reveals that such self-affirmation is often used to solicit public trust when the media’s reputation is called into question. This chapter also explores the political economy of the .’s coverage of the phone hacking scandal and the Leveson Inquiry.
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 17:54:27 | 只看該作者
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 21:15:28 | 只看該作者
,Journalistic Metadiscourse: Access to the Media’s Public Sphere,e importance of the victims to the debate, the study contends that limiting the stakeholder status to those who have been hurt by the press results in a limited range of views and risks shutting down more neutral voices that could have enriched the debate in the public sphere.
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 02:02:38 | 只看該作者
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 04:51:46 | 只看該作者
Representation of Media Policy, advances arguments different from the position of that media organisations in the debate. Was that the case in the coverage of the debate that followed the . phone hacking scandal and the Leveson Inquiry? Using empirical data, this chapter provides the answer to this question. The chapter also reveals alternative views in the media policy debate.
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 10:10:56 | 只看該作者
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 13:53:19 | 只看該作者
Linking Historical and Maritime Archaeology,untable. They include the Royal Commissions on the press (RCP) 1949, 1962 and 1977 along with two Calcutt Committees. This chapter discusses the different efforts at ensuring effective press regulation in UK.
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 18:52:54 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-18 03:11
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
隆安县| 晋城| 崇礼县| 新田县| 博兴县| 石城县| 泗阳县| 紫阳县| 石渠县| 延庆县| 长丰县| 云南省| 建瓯市| 淳安县| 二连浩特市| 武乡县| 本溪市| 扶余县| 武清区| 东阳市| 新丰县| 建宁县| 陇西县| 吴旗县| 抚宁县| 五莲县| 兴义市| 温泉县| 大厂| 大连市| 麻栗坡县| 东光县| 讷河市| 高安市| 汶上县| 河源市| 台南市| 阿克| 邢台市| 嘉黎县| 宜君县|