找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Austrian Philosophy Past and Present; Essays in Honor of R Keith Lehrer,Johann Christian Marek Book 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Do

[復制鏈接]
樓主: Forbidding
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 00:27:55 | 只看該作者
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 01:23:24 | 只看該作者
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 08:00:47 | 只看該作者
,Haller and Brentano’s Empiricism,Haller claims that Brentano is an empiricist Brentano is close to Comte’s positivism and to the Vienna circle in emphasizing the methods of natural science as appropriate for philosophy. He also underscores the importance of experience as a starting point of analysis. All this seems convincing.
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 10:09:47 | 只看該作者
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 14:16:55 | 只看該作者
Inductive Knowledge,A plea for an inductivist theory of knowledge is presumably not quite in tune with the fashion of the day. Nevertheless, contrary to the currently prevailing opinion that the case for induction is closed and beyond any hope, my claim is that induction is the only hope left if we want to avoid skepticism.
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 19:59:28 | 只看該作者
An Autobiographical Outline,The historical background of my schooldays was the last period of the Austrian Nazi regime and those years when Austria no longer existed after it had become part of the German Reich. I was sent to school in Graz after the war and took my final exams in 1947/48 at a night school.
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 01:28:35 | 只看該作者
The Motion of Geostationary Satellite,omponent of what separates Austrian philosophy from German philosophy. German philosophy tries to build grand (but ultimately substandard) metaphysical edifices; Austrian philosophy tries (without evident success) to demolish them.
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 05:24:34 | 只看該作者
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 08:36:40 | 只看該作者
Metaphysics: De-Stroyed or In-De(Con)structible,omponent of what separates Austrian philosophy from German philosophy. German philosophy tries to build grand (but ultimately substandard) metaphysical edifices; Austrian philosophy tries (without evident success) to demolish them.
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 12:05:35 | 只看該作者
Analyticity, Carnap, Quine, and Truth,ruth against the type of argument he himself advanced in “Two Dogmas” against Carnap’s notion of analyticity. If he wants to keep his argument, Quine has to discard truth along with analyticity. At the end of the paper I suggest an interpretation of Quine on which he can be seen as having done just that.
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-14 01:24
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
北碚区| 岑溪市| 西充县| 合川市| 廉江市| 顺平县| 沙洋县| 四川省| 定南县| 无极县| 安塞县| 华坪县| 紫金县| 炉霍县| 霍林郭勒市| 忻城县| 和林格尔县| 汾阳市| 勃利县| 仪征市| 应城市| 沙田区| 金昌市| 神农架林区| 三河市| 武宁县| 玛沁县| 石家庄市| 竹溪县| 乌苏市| 开江县| 孝义市| 汝州市| 永和县| 东平县| 濮阳县| 双牌县| 纳雍县| 巍山| 密云县| 兴城市|