Titlebook: Austrian Philosophy Past and Present; Essays in Honor of R Keith Lehrer,Johann Christian Marek Book 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Do

相一致

Analyticity, Carnap, Quine, and Truth,ine’s attack that should strike one as extremely puzzling, namely his objection to Carnap’s account of analyticity. For it appears that, if this objection works, it will not only do away with analyticity, it will also do away with other semantic notions, notions that (or so one would have thought) Q

反饋

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5720-9David Hume; Immanuel Kant; Ludwig Wittgenstein; epistemology; idea; knowledge; metaphysics; mind; ontology; t

忍耐

半身雕像

草本植物

Commemorate

botany

OGLE

Bridle

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12289-7ts linguistic equivalents), or—in a more mentalistic diction—thoughts about oneself. The aim of my paper is not a critical assessment of Haller’s interpretation of the self in Wittgenstein’s and Mach’s works. Rather, it is supposed to be (1) a synopsis of the approaches Haller takes into considerati

Maximizer

Antoni Moore,Jared Hayes,B. L. William Wongg these philosophers, the two figuring in my title, Wittgenstein and Husserl, loom particularly large. Over the years I have come to believe that my colleagues are wrong and that we have not fully grasped the import of the philosophy of the likes of Husserl and Wittgenstein. I have also come to beli