Titlebook: Assessing Model-Based Reasoning using Evidence- Centered Design; A Suite of Research- Robert J Mislevy,Geneva Haertel,Cindy Ziker Book 2017

Occlusion

Conclusion,ays we can support and assess their learning. Familiar testing practices offer little guidance, however, for designing valid assessments of more ambitious proficiencies in more complex settings. These . can support the development of tasks for assessing model-based reasoning in a variety of contexts

Interlocking

Robert J Mislevy,Geneva Haertel,Cindy ZikerHelps integrate standards, instruction, formative assessment, and accountability measures.Builds on principles of evidence-centered assessment design.Provides links to interactive, online versions of

buoyant

極微小

Assessing Model-Based Reasoning using Evidence- Centered Design978-3-319-52246-3Series ISSN 2191-544X Series E-ISSN 2191-5458

小隔間

CYN

揮舞

La propagazione degli ultrasuoni,l-based reasoning is central to science education and thus science assessment. Building on research in assessment, science education, and learning sciences, we present a set of design patterns to help assessment designers, researchers, and teachers create tasks for assessing aspects of model-based r

愛(ài)得痛了

埋伏

Fondamenti di Meccanica e Biomeccanica reasoning in a way that supports either focused tasks (building on one or a few design patterns) or more extensive investigations (building jointly on several .). This chapter overviews the design-pattern perspective on assessing model-based reasoning, as a prelude to the next chapters that look mo

compel

Fondamenti di Meccanica e Biomeccanicaus of data. The Model Formation . addresses features of this contextualized process that are similar across contexts and models. Design choices concerning the knowledge and skill that will be encompassed, variable features of tasks, potential work products and observations.