Titlebook: Assessing Model-Based Reasoning using Evidence- Centered Design; A Suite of Research- Robert J Mislevy,Geneva Haertel,Cindy Ziker Book 2017

價值在貶值

2191-544X for assessing aspects of model-based reasoning: Model Formation, Model Use, Model Elaboration, Model Articulation, Model Evaluation, Model Revision, and Model-Based Inquiry. Each design pattern lays out consid978-3-319-52245-6978-3-319-52246-3Series ISSN 2191-544X Series E-ISSN 2191-5458

獨裁政府

Introduction,l-based reasoning is central to science education and thus science assessment. Building on research in assessment, science education, and learning sciences, we present a set of design patterns to help assessment designers, researchers, and teachers create tasks for assessing aspects of model-based r

Estrogen

Model-Based Reasoning,, and reasoning about the situation through the model. Results from cognitive research can help us understand and assess both the experiential and reflective aspects of model-based reasoning. This chapter reviews research on model-based reasoning and the inquiry cycle to define aspects of model-base

omnibus

Commission

Gudgeon

GRE

Favorable

Model Evaluation,ies to determine whether, how well, or in what aspects, a model is appropriate for a given situation. Potential Observations may include whether students identify cues of model misfit; whether particular areas, patterns, or unaccounted-for features of the situation are identified; and whether hypoth

古文字學

傷心

Model-Based Inquiry,dents’ capabilitiesto manage their reasoning across in inquiry cycles. A key Variable Task Feature to consider is the degree of scaffolding to provide students as they move from one aspect of an inquiry to another. All the considerations, design choices, work products, and observations addressed in