Titlebook: Art, Education, and the Democratic Commitment; A Defense of State S David T. Schwartz Book 2000 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2000 P

鋪?zhàn)?/a>

engender

The Politics of Subsidy,y but arguing that the state ought not promote . particular conception of the good life. Having examined the aesthetic dimension of the proposed democratic justification, this chapter evaluates whether the proposal can meet the argumentative burdens of political philosophy. It does this by evaluatin

填滿

競(jìng)選運(yùn)動(dòng)

辮子帶來(lái)幫助

978-90-481-5450-0Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2000

墊子

內(nèi)閣

Extrema and Visual Recognition,ne extreme, this question reflects the exhortations of embattled subsidy advocates—“Surely the arts have great value, so why . give them government money?” At another extreme, it reflects the unfortunate fact that the debate over subsidy has been framed much more by those who oppose it than those wh

適宜

使糾纏

–LOUS

Domains of Attraction and Norming Constants,ust opportunities for political education. While claims are often and easily made about art’s value for . education, here I build on Chapter Two in arguing that the arts also have important value for . education. To make the case for art as democratic education, this chapter describes how aesthetica