找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Approval Voting; Steven J. Brams,Peter C. Fishburn Book 2007Latest edition Springer-Verlag New York 2007 Election.Elections.Electoral.Elec

[復制鏈接]
樓主: 戰(zhàn)神
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 07:23:20 | 只看該作者
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 09:49:09 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06663-5ce in practice. Similarly, the earlier findings on sincerity, strategy-proofness, and Condorcet candidates facilitate theoretical comparisons among different systems but do not demonstrate whether, in a particular election, a Condorcet candidate was or could have been elected if voting was sincere.
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 12:37:43 | 只看該作者
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 17:56:59 | 只看該作者
Wolfgang J. Friedl,Karsten Weicheltaries (Section 1.3); the 1976 House Majority Leader contest (Chapter 4); the 1959 Boston mayoral race (Section 6.6); and the 1970 United States Senate election in New York (Section 7.5), in which we also looked at possible polling effects. In this chapter, we shall examine what seems almost a repris
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 20:31:56 | 只看該作者
Wolfgang J. Friedl,Karsten Weicheltincluded in this election was the most significant independent or third-party candidate since George Wallace in 1968, whose impact on the 1968 race we assessed in Section 8.3. As we shall show, the outcome of the 1980 race would not have changed under approval voting, but the independent candidate,
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 00:23:49 | 只看該作者
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 06:35:30 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06663-5ce in practice. Similarly, the earlier findings on sincerity, strategy-proofness, and Condorcet candidates facilitate theoretical comparisons among different systems but do not demonstrate whether, in a particular election, a Condorcet candidate was or could have been elected if voting was sincere.
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 11:08:44 | 只看該作者
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 12:51:17 | 只看該作者
Book 2007Latest editions - and their generally favorable experience with it. After a generation of discussion and debate on the subject, the authors remain convinced that "Approval Voting" is as relevant today as it was when rigorous analysis and systematic empirical research on this election reform began more than 30 yea
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 20:25:01 | 只看該作者
- and their generally favorable experience with it. After a generation of discussion and debate on the subject, the authors remain convinced that "Approval Voting" is as relevant today as it was when rigorous analysis and systematic empirical research on this election reform began more than 30 yea978-0-387-49895-9978-0-387-49896-6
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-14 15:19
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
铜山县| 马鞍山市| 汉阴县| 青田县| 全南县| 淳安县| 福泉市| 庆阳市| 台南县| 石楼县| 涿鹿县| 潼南县| 临安市| 岚皋县| 夏河县| 罗定市| 桂阳县| 容城县| 胶州市| 高陵县| 台安县| 新兴县| 荔波县| 耿马| 黑河市| 乐至县| 滦南县| 绍兴县| 禹州市| 拉孜县| 和硕县| 四平市| 阳信县| 璧山县| 宜良县| 高台县| 静乐县| 句容市| 宿州市| 安义县| 松阳县|