找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Approval Voting; Steven J. Brams,Peter C. Fishburn Book 2007Latest edition Springer-Verlag New York 2007 Election.Elections.Electoral.Elec

[復制鏈接]
查看: 51036|回復: 45
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:11:08 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
期刊全稱Approval Voting
影響因子2023Steven J. Brams,Peter C. Fishburn
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/161/160355/160355.mp4
發(fā)行地址Exposition of a simple and logical potential electoral reform.Gives theoretical analysis as well as case studies based on actual elections
圖書封面Titlebook: Approval Voting;  Steven J. Brams,Peter C. Fishburn Book 2007Latest edition Springer-Verlag New York 2007 Election.Elections.Electoral.Elec
影響因子."Approval Voting" proposes a compelling way to elect some 500,000 officials in public elections. Under this system voters may vote for, or approve of, as many candidates as they like in multicandidate elections. Among the many benefits of approval voting are its propensity to elect the majority candidate (rather than the strongest minority candidate, as often occurs under plurality voting), its relative invulnerability to insincere or strategic voting, and - by offering voters the opportunity to influence election outcomes more equitably - a probable increase in voter turnout...Since the publication of the first edition of this book, its arguments in favor of an election reform practically unknown in 1983 have stood the test of time. Perhaps the proof of the pudding lies in the adoption of approval voting by about a dozen professional societies - several with tens of thousands of members - and their generally favorable experience with it. After a generation of discussion and debate on the subject, the authors remain convinced that "Approval Voting" is as relevant today as it was when rigorous analysis and systematic empirical research on this election reform began more than 30 yea
Pindex Book 2007Latest edition
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Approval Voting影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Approval Voting影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Approval Voting網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Approval Voting網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱Approval Voting被引頻次




書目名稱Approval Voting被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Approval Voting年度引用




書目名稱Approval Voting年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Approval Voting讀者反饋




書目名稱Approval Voting讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:13:32 | 只看該作者
The Condorcet Criterion: Which System Best Finds the Majority Candidate?,systems. This is in part due to the fact that, unlike other nonranked systems, approval voting imposes no restrictions on the number of candidates for whom an individual can vote. Thus, voters can express their approval for all candidates they consider acceptable, without worrying about abandoning t
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:38:20 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:17:46 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:20:59 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:07:42 | 只看該作者
Polls and the Problem of Strategic Information in Elections,mple, because there is a reason—they can effect a better outcome by not voting for all their most-preferred or acceptable candidates. In plurality voting, in particular, the practice of voting for a second choice is not uncommon in elections wherein one’s first choice would appear not to be a seriou
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:34:36 | 只看該作者
Recent Empirical Examples and Theoretical Extensions,aries (Section 1.3); the 1976 House Majority Leader contest (Chapter 4); the 1959 Boston mayoral race (Section 6.6); and the 1970 United States Senate election in New York (Section 7.5), in which we also looked at possible polling effects. In this chapter, we shall examine what seems almost a repris
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:23:51 | 只看該作者
Deducing Preferences and Choices in the 1980 Presidential Election,included in this election was the most significant independent or third-party candidate since George Wallace in 1968, whose impact on the 1968 race we assessed in Section 8.3. As we shall show, the outcome of the 1980 race would not have changed under approval voting, but the independent candidate,
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:05:10 | 只看該作者
Steven J. Brams,Peter C. FishburnExposition of a simple and logical potential electoral reform.Gives theoretical analysis as well as case studies based on actual elections
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:39:29 | 只看該作者
http://image.papertrans.cn/b/image/160355.jpg
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-14 15:18
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
四子王旗| 苍溪县| 南宁市| 博兴县| 阿鲁科尔沁旗| 宁强县| 昭通市| 宜川县| 武城县| 日土县| 海口市| 吉林市| 河池市| 饶阳县| 许昌市| 静宁县| 呼和浩特市| 富裕县| 闸北区| 胶南市| 江北区| 兴安县| 台中市| 乌兰察布市| 商丘市| 洛川县| 库车县| 甘南县| 临猗县| 东海县| 定南县| 曲阜市| 商水县| 苍山县| 汝南县| 逊克县| 蓝山县| 荔波县| 宁南县| 江北区| 高邮市|