找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Approval Voting; Steven J. Brams,Peter C. Fishburn Book 2007Latest edition Springer-Verlag New York 2007 Election.Elections.Electoral.Elec

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 51035|回復(fù): 45
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:11:08 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
期刊全稱Approval Voting
影響因子2023Steven J. Brams,Peter C. Fishburn
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/161/160355/160355.mp4
發(fā)行地址Exposition of a simple and logical potential electoral reform.Gives theoretical analysis as well as case studies based on actual elections
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Approval Voting;  Steven J. Brams,Peter C. Fishburn Book 2007Latest edition Springer-Verlag New York 2007 Election.Elections.Electoral.Elec
影響因子."Approval Voting" proposes a compelling way to elect some 500,000 officials in public elections. Under this system voters may vote for, or approve of, as many candidates as they like in multicandidate elections. Among the many benefits of approval voting are its propensity to elect the majority candidate (rather than the strongest minority candidate, as often occurs under plurality voting), its relative invulnerability to insincere or strategic voting, and - by offering voters the opportunity to influence election outcomes more equitably - a probable increase in voter turnout...Since the publication of the first edition of this book, its arguments in favor of an election reform practically unknown in 1983 have stood the test of time. Perhaps the proof of the pudding lies in the adoption of approval voting by about a dozen professional societies - several with tens of thousands of members - and their generally favorable experience with it. After a generation of discussion and debate on the subject, the authors remain convinced that "Approval Voting" is as relevant today as it was when rigorous analysis and systematic empirical research on this election reform began more than 30 yea
Pindex Book 2007Latest edition
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱Approval Voting影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Approval Voting影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Approval Voting網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Approval Voting網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Approval Voting被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Approval Voting被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Approval Voting年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Approval Voting年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Approval Voting讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Approval Voting讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:13:32 | 只看該作者
The Condorcet Criterion: Which System Best Finds the Majority Candidate?,systems. This is in part due to the fact that, unlike other nonranked systems, approval voting imposes no restrictions on the number of candidates for whom an individual can vote. Thus, voters can express their approval for all candidates they consider acceptable, without worrying about abandoning t
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:38:20 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:17:46 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:20:59 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:07:42 | 只看該作者
Polls and the Problem of Strategic Information in Elections,mple, because there is a reason—they can effect a better outcome by not voting for all their most-preferred or acceptable candidates. In plurality voting, in particular, the practice of voting for a second choice is not uncommon in elections wherein one’s first choice would appear not to be a seriou
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:34:36 | 只看該作者
Recent Empirical Examples and Theoretical Extensions,aries (Section 1.3); the 1976 House Majority Leader contest (Chapter 4); the 1959 Boston mayoral race (Section 6.6); and the 1970 United States Senate election in New York (Section 7.5), in which we also looked at possible polling effects. In this chapter, we shall examine what seems almost a repris
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:23:51 | 只看該作者
Deducing Preferences and Choices in the 1980 Presidential Election,included in this election was the most significant independent or third-party candidate since George Wallace in 1968, whose impact on the 1968 race we assessed in Section 8.3. As we shall show, the outcome of the 1980 race would not have changed under approval voting, but the independent candidate,
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:05:10 | 只看該作者
Steven J. Brams,Peter C. FishburnExposition of a simple and logical potential electoral reform.Gives theoretical analysis as well as case studies based on actual elections
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:39:29 | 只看該作者
http://image.papertrans.cn/b/image/160355.jpg
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-14 12:33
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
荃湾区| 双鸭山市| 普陀区| 英吉沙县| 金华市| 高州市| 赫章县| 霍州市| 余姚市| 丰城市| 武邑县| 玛沁县| 饶平县| 霞浦县| 正定县| 双峰县| 武安市| 临夏县| 通许县| 股票| 滕州市| 虎林市| 和政县| 临沭县| 万全县| 苍溪县| 辽宁省| 会同县| 台东市| 丁青县| 孙吴县| 合肥市| 志丹县| 盘锦市| 阳新县| 洞口县| 库尔勒市| 松阳县| 通城县| 呈贡县| 库尔勒市|