Titlebook: Allegorical Form and Theory in Hildegard of Bingen’s Books of Visions; Dinah Wouters Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Autho

faucet

leniency

AMBI

2945-5936 llegorical theory, and questions of language and cognition.OThis book analyses how the three books of visions by Hildegard of Bingen use the allegorical vision as a form of knowledge. It describes how the visionary’s use of allegory and allegorical exegesis is linked to theories of cognition, interp

幼稚

構(gòu)想

Kristin A. Bartlett,Jorge D. Cambae prejudices and offers an alternative view of the relation between allegory and allegoresis. The second theoretical entanglement is that between formal and ideological definitions of allegory. I offer a reconciliation of formal definitions of allegory with those approaches that define allegory as a concept, set of ideas, ideology, or aesthetic.

Hypomania

甜瓜

Working with Content and Typography,ical exegesis and the question of theological language. Ultimately, I claim that the specific strategies employed by Hildegard in her allegory and allegoresis should be regarded as a literary form that self-consciously situates itself within contemporary developments and debates on Scripture, language, and knowledge.

新陳代謝

Vision and Explanation,hes to the visions, which put the emphasis on symbolism, disparateness, incomprehensibility, and the visual aspect. In contrast, my approach highlights the recognisability of exegetical method, the conventionality of the metaphors, and the iterability of the process.

enchant

Allegory as Form and Concept,e prejudices and offers an alternative view of the relation between allegory and allegoresis. The second theoretical entanglement is that between formal and ideological definitions of allegory. I offer a reconciliation of formal definitions of allegory with those approaches that define allegory as a concept, set of ideas, ideology, or aesthetic.

Overthrow