Titlebook: Alibis and Corroborators; Psychological, Crimi Joshua D. Behl,Megan R. Kienzle Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), u

蒙太奇

會議

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-8185-0d an alibi that is later determined to be incorrect, and (2) failing to utilize an alibi when it is present and has at least some corroboration. Case law and academic articles illustrate this uniquely non-affirmative defense, with defendants claiming not to be legally responsible because they could

STERN

LAVA

aristocracy

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-3542-6nd the salaciousness of the story can actually serve to bolster the believability of an alibi. Finally, Allison ends with a discussion about methodological concerns in alibi research while calling for additional research.

露天歷史劇

We Have to Start Somewhere: Classifying Alibis to Launch a Literature,ical testing of the taxonomy to date (e.g., Olson and Charman, Psychol Crime Law 18:453–471, 2012) and suggest modifications that may help make the taxonomy more applicable to current discussions of alibis. Finally, they finish with a number of future directions to further advance the taxonomy and our understanding of alibis generally.

beta-cells

軍火

許可

erse contributions and case studies.Offers new lines of theo.This book aims to increase understanding of alibis and corroborators, examining the role alibis play – or fail to play – in innocence cases. It analyses the factors that can influence the suspect, the defense team, the alibi corroborator,

刺耳的聲音

Der Dachdecker als Genossenschafter,r provides a summary of each of the following chapters to provide the readers with the overall flow of the text and identify areas of focus for those who are interested in research on alibis and corroborators.