Titlebook: Alibis and Corroborators; Psychological, Crimi Joshua D. Behl,Megan R. Kienzle Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), u

Roosevelt

書目名稱Alibis and Corroborators影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Alibis and Corroborators影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Alibis and Corroborators網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Alibis and Corroborators網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Alibis and Corroborators被引頻次




書目名稱Alibis and Corroborators被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Alibis and Corroborators年度引用




書目名稱Alibis and Corroborators年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Alibis and Corroborators讀者反饋




書目名稱Alibis and Corroborators讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

北極熊

Towards a System Variable Approach to Improving the Quality of Alibi Evidence,all evidence that can corroborate their alibis. Third, research on deception detection should be leveraged to develop strategies that improve evaluators’ abilities to discriminate between deceptive and honest alibi providers. We summarize the limited research that has taken a system variable approac

的事物

OPINE

Child Alibi Corroborators,to influence evidence assessments as well. The authors end with a discussion about how this topic could be further studied and expanded to broaden our understanding of children’s potential role in our legal system’s use of alibi corroboration.

Triglyceride

The Strategic Use of Alibi Defenses,d an alibi that is later determined to be incorrect, and (2) failing to utilize an alibi when it is present and has at least some corroboration. Case law and academic articles illustrate this uniquely non-affirmative defense, with defendants claiming not to be legally responsible because they could

WAG

The Effect of Erroneous Alibis,monstrate itself) may lead a suspect to lack the concern over the correctness of their alibi statement needed to protect themselves from making incorrect statements early on in the investigation. The authors discuss absent alibis as well as how problems with alibi evidence can transcend throughout t

Cubicle

厚臉皮

黑豹

Exclude

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-3634-8mples we utilize (generally asking American college students to act as mock investigators or jurors, quite unlike asking real-world detectives or attorneys how they consider and handle alibi evidence in actual cases).