Titlebook: Airbus Industrie; Conflict and Coopera Steven McGuire Book 1997 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1997 Abstrac

吸氣

heart-murmur

foodstuff

2633-5964 ustrie. By understanding this trade dispute, the author casts light on broader issues of international cooperation by focusing on the bilateral trade negotiations that took place between 1979 and 1992. He considers the role played by aerospace firms, the GATT and the transatlantic alliance in shapin

牙齒

Das Management des Organizational Slackn international collaboration that arises out of the failure of European states to develop successful national strategies to compete with the United States. In the final section, we examine how changes in the international aerospace market from 1970 onward undermined US dominance and, inadvertently, provided Airbus with its opportunity to compete.

使害羞

Vasodilation

Grundlagen des Innovationsmanagements,intensify, not subside. By 1982, it was clear that the GATT accord was not going to offer the protection that American firms had hoped. Gradually both the American industry and government began to regard Europe as guilty of violating both the letter and spirit of the accord by continuing to provide Airbus with subsidies.

說笑

Das Management radikaler InnovationenIt was doing this without any clear indication that the existing programmes were making any money for the consortium. American anger at this development was intense. To compound matters, for the first time in the dispute, the proposed Airbus aircraft threatened the viability of a new US project, the MDC MD-11.

Neolithic

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-81914-7s acceptance of limits on direct subsidy in exchange for the American acceptance of discipline on indirect subsidy. The 1992 agreement has not stopped angry words being exchanged between the trading partners, but it has formed the regime around which talks on further disputes can revolve.

slow-wave-sleep

上坡

,Airbus Expansion and Export Finance, 1970–80,es the first, and often overlooked, arena of US-EC conflict over Airbus, namely, the use of subsidized export finance as a weapon in the struggle for aircraft orders. This dispute led in time to the development of an OECD-sponsored international regime that governs export financing of aircraft.