Titlebook: Airbus Industrie; Conflict and Coopera Steven McGuire Book 1997 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1997 Abstrac

公款

書目名稱Airbus Industrie影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Airbus Industrie影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Airbus Industrie網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Airbus Industrie網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Airbus Industrie被引頻次




書目名稱Airbus Industrie被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Airbus Industrie年度引用




書目名稱Airbus Industrie年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Airbus Industrie讀者反饋




書目名稱Airbus Industrie讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

思想

Cooperation in International Political Economy,national cooperation, there is widespread agreement on a working definition.. Cooperation arises, ‘when actors adjust their behaviour to the actual or anticipated preferences of others, through a process of policy coordination’.. Cooperation in the Airbus case should manifest itself as the adjustment of European Community and US trade policies.

博愛家

Book 1997 understanding this trade dispute, the author casts light on broader issues of international cooperation by focusing on the bilateral trade negotiations that took place between 1979 and 1992. He considers the role played by aerospace firms, the GATT and the transatlantic alliance in shaping this cooperative outcome.

大火

Das Management der lernenden Organisationperation in 1970 and throughout the 1980s caused increasing concern among American government and industry officials. Bilateral EC-US trade diplomacy over Airbus resolved the dispute in 1992 with the signing of an agreement governing international trade in civilian aerospace. In essence, we seek to

Inflated

防御

增減字母法

Methodische Konzeption der Untersuchung,ts of the A300 including the critical sale to Eastern Airlines, and 2. the admission of the United Kingdom back into the consortium. Second, it explores the first, and often overlooked, arena of US-EC conflict over Airbus, namely, the use of subsidized export finance as a weapon in the struggle for

贊美者

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-93417-8de the focus for the trade friction over Airbus — the GATT Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft. The Agreement sought to introduce a measure of discipline over government influence on trade in the civil aircraft sector. This process was initiated by the United States government, when President Carte

ALIEN

Grundlagen des Innovationsmanagements,T accord and regarded it as a good, if not foolproof, agreement protecting US firms from unfair competition. However, the 1980s saw the trade dispute intensify, not subside. By 1982, it was clear that the GATT accord was not going to offer the protection that American firms had hoped. Gradually both

albuminuria

Das Management radikaler Innovationenbus consortium had launched three aircraft programmes (A300, A310 and A320) in relatively quick succession and was now planning to undertake another. It was doing this without any clear indication that the existing programmes were making any money for the consortium. American anger at this developme