Titlebook: After the Nation?; Critical Reflections Keith Breen (Lecturer in Political Theory),Shane O Book 2010 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macm

exterminate

書目名稱After the Nation?影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱After the Nation?影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱After the Nation?網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱After the Nation?網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱After the Nation?被引頻次




書目名稱After the Nation?被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱After the Nation?年度引用




書目名稱After the Nation?年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱After the Nation?讀者反饋




書目名稱After the Nation?讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

哎呦

Pirate Narratives and the Colonial Atlantic,f such government. Many have also argued that nationalism is a requirement of modern industrial socie-ties, since the common, homogeneous culture it helped generate proved decisive in the rise of an educated workforce essential for technologi-cal advancement, economic growth, prosperity, and progres

angiography

Crisis, Anxiety and Ontological Insecurity,olism insist that nationalism seeks to equate the nation with a sovereign state, while in reality an overwhelming majority of nations are stateless and unable to build nation-states because they often inhabit territories shared with other nations. The paradigm shift occurs through the realization th

LINE

The January Plenum and the 1933 Plan,se of the Soviet Union in 1991. There were apparent counter-tendencies in the growth of confederal and federal organizations, most famously the European Union. But most of these, including the EU, are multinational confederations or federations rather than truly supranational or postnational entitie

Obsessed

Ganglion-Cyst

Jon Cruddas,Jonathan Rutherforddes at both mass and elite level, represent compromises among competing visions of the state, and contain their own dynamics, which may be centripetal or centrifugal. The old unionist consensus has been undermined but there is, as of yet, no nationalist consensus to replace it. There are few constit

過時(shí)

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230294912e does not entitle a people to political independence: only the force to exert itself as a state against others’ (in Howard, 1991, pp. 39–40). Some young would-be nation-states have viewed large-scale sacrifice in war as an essential rite of passage, as Australians viewed the Gallipoli campaign in t

冷淡周邊

https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2175-5for national self-determination rules out global egalitarianism as an account of global justice is mistaken for a number of reasons, as I have argued in more detail elsewhere (Armstrong, 2010). Actually, global egalitarians are able to carve out space for self-determination in a variety of ways. The

asthma

reception