Titlebook: Afghanistan and the Coloniality of Diplomacy; The British Legation Maximilian Drephal Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Autho

滑稽

難理解

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230343344orders that governed those within. Its structures spoke to several international audiences, Kabul’s growing international diplomatic society as well as Afghan and colonial Indian publics. It was a habitat that sheltered families, women, children and animals, whilst organising and regulating its workforce.

滴注

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230343344m invited a rediscovery of Afghanistan along old patterns by a new generation of diplomatic service entrants. Partition prompted the material reordering of empire and brought to light the contradictions between the Legation’s ambiguous and contradictory identities. The future of empire was at stake in the question of its ownership.

PRE

hankering

The Remaking of Anglo-Afghan Relations,tions’ argues that independence was an international question that required empire from whose dependence it had sprung, in terms of political recognition as well as ontological reasoning. 1919 brought independence, but it did not spell the end of empire. The British Legation in Kabul materialised diplomatic inequality.

Carminative

競選運(yùn)動

Accreditation and Performance, yet, like the Legation as a whole, British Ministers existed in liminal temporal, spatial and ontological conditions. They never fully completed the transition from the authoritarianism of colonial governance to the reciprocity and equality of international diplomacy as long as the colonial archive provided diplomacy’s performative blueprints.

蚊子

Architecture,orders that governed those within. Its structures spoke to several international audiences, Kabul’s growing international diplomatic society as well as Afghan and colonial Indian publics. It was a habitat that sheltered families, women, children and animals, whilst organising and regulating its workforce.

Scintigraphy

From Colonial Legation to Postimperial Embassy,m invited a rediscovery of Afghanistan along old patterns by a new generation of diplomatic service entrants. Partition prompted the material reordering of empire and brought to light the contradictions between the Legation’s ambiguous and contradictory identities. The future of empire was at stake in the question of its ownership.

groggy

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36934-6uster in constant flux as well as a multicentred space. The introduction employs the concept of synchronic and diachronic coloniality to trace the continued impact of colonialism in the absence of colonialism itself.