Titlebook: Afghanistan and the Coloniality of Diplomacy; The British Legation Maximilian Drephal Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Autho

積極詞匯

Diplomatic Bodies,iplomatic body from between the lines of diplomatic reporting and recording. Colonial officers introduced the Raj’s notions of physicality and racial difference into their relations with Afghan representatives and statesmen. Diplomats gendered and infantilised, bestialised and Orientalised Afghan bo

物質(zhì)

Magnificent

仔細(xì)檢查

Conclusions: The Coloniality of Diplomacy,hed this story with meaning and the notion of permanence. Endings of many kinds were the Legation’s defining features, which displayed the unravelling of imagined imperial might time and again. Far from ending and disappearing, knowledge of Afghanistan was transformed. Diplomatic practice rooted in

amputation

THE

Subaltern Biographies,cally, to the colonial state as well as across a region. The chapter shows the fashioning of several gradated subalternities in a microcosmic representation of colonial Indian society, authority and hierarchies.

漂浮

Diplomatic Bodies,developed ‘a(chǎn)t home’, in India and during the historical Anglo-Afghan encounter, which shaped, trained and maintained the colonisers’ bodies and civilised the colonised, ensured that Afghanistan continued to be framed in colonial frameworks.

非實體

Conclusions: The Coloniality of Diplomacy,omacy is only a first step towards an epistemic decolonisation of diplomatic studies and histories of inter-state relations. Coloniality means the temporal entanglement of colonial and postcolonial orders and their mutuality. As empire shaped Afghanistan colonially, independent Afghanistan also shaped empire postcolonially.

按等級

山頂可休息

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230343344ate in India in the past and in its present. The Legation emerges as a colonial institution . in the age of independence, which funnelled diverse colonial experiences of governance within the colonial state in India and its empire at large.