Titlebook: A Levinasian Ethics for Education‘s Commonplaces; Between Calling and Clarence W. Joldersma Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Na

誘導(dǎo)

Nilotpal Borah,Abhijit Gogoi,Jiban Saikiaeacher as other, it suggest that the learning process involves welcoming an external disturbance, something the chapter develops as the inspirational nature of what Levinas calls the ethical. This situates and relativizes the traditional model of the student as autonomous self-learner. Te Levinasian

CONE

Antibacterial Metal-Organic Frameworkstivity, traditionally construed as an autonomous subject embodying rationally developed disciplinary knowledge. Below that autonomy, the subjectivity of the teacher is a call to responsibility that comes through the student other, that is, as a unique person. This call acts as a regulatory function

戰(zhàn)役

Antibacterial Metal-Organic Frameworkscally connected to an understanding of curricular content and then reinterprets this within a Levinasian frame. The analysis suggests that the representational model is inadequate for understanding curricular knowledge, and the chapter supplements it with the Levinasian ideas of listening and tactfu

填料

傲慢人

不幸的人

Book 2014Joldersma applies Levinas‘s ethics systematically to the commonplaces of education - teaching, learning, curriculum, and institutions - and elucidates the role of justice and responsibility and the meaning of calling and inspiration in education.

為寵愛

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137415493Levinas; justice; transcendence; hope; commonplaces; responsibility; autonomy; representationalism; learning

獨(dú)特性

Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2014

詞匯表

Front Mattererwhelmed by the urgent, but lack the ability to focus on important data. This chapter provides a summary of this dilemma, describes a new analysis paradigm that links data-driven and hypothesis driven approaches, introduces a new prototype analyst workbench, and discusses an educational approach to

沙草紙

Introduction,specific conditions. Validation experiments for nuclear system and component designs are used mainly to confirm whether the fusion system and component designs, equipment and nuclear materials satisfy the design requirements. The three categories of fusion neutronics experiments will be discussed in