Titlebook: War and Memory in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus; Julie Fedor,Markku Kangaspuro,Tatiana Zhurzhenko Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) an

Little

有發(fā)明天才

Ostarbeiters of the Third Reich in Ukrainian and European Public Discourses: Restitution, Recognitiod through post-Cold War restitution politics when the German government finally acknowledged moral responsibility for forced labor as a crime of the Nazi regime and started issuing moral compensation for its victims.

手榴彈

熱情贊揚

The Holocaust in the Public Discourse of Post-Soviet Ukrainethe country’s Soviet past and its present geopolitical position between the European Union and Russia. It pays particular attention to the role played by Jewish international organizations on this issue, and to the views of Jewish Ukrainian intellectuals on the Ukrainian–Jewish dialogue.

FRONT

The “Partisan Republic”: Colonial Myths and Memory Wars in Belaruse Soviet-era resistance to this myth and the unmaking of the edifice in the post-Soviet era are analyzed in terms of postcolonial theory through discussion of the works of several Soviet and post-Soviet authors, musicians, and artists.

Excise

Great Patriotic War Memory in Sevastopol: Making Sense of Suffering in the “City of Military Glory”rth, of suffering and defeat followed by glory. The chapter considers the commemoration of elements of Sevastopol’s war history that do not sit easily with the glory narratives, and concludes that Sevastopol’s mythology of military glory, though enduring, is ultimately limiting for the city’s past as well as its future.

Externalize

Introduction: War and Memory in Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus,emory cultures in this connection. Next, the essay sketches out the specifics of the war memory landscapes of the region, and then of each of the three individual countries, before moving on to introduce the key organizing themes and findings of the book.

NAV

Repetitions

Keratin

Memory, Kinship, and the Mobilization of the Dead: The Russian State and the “Immortal Regiment” Movses on attempts by the state authorities and their supporters to instrumentalize the new ritual and to appropriate the Red Army’s war dead, and the emotions they evoke. It explores the ways in which the figure of the dead Red Army soldier is being brought back to life in new ways as part of the current regime’s authoritarian project.