Titlebook: Virtue and Responsibility in Policy Research and Advice; Berry Tholen Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 scien

擦掉

http://image.papertrans.cn/v/image/983455.jpg

防銹

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65253-5scientific policy advice; scientific integrity; research ethics; Ethics; policy advisors; decision making

resuscitation

Deciding on Tools and Risks,he scientist to respect the subjects he researches (e.g., animals, environment, or human beings). Second, choices must be made between measuring instruments that are epistemologically equivalent but might have different social consequences. Third, choices must be made about the level of risk of being wrong that is acceptable.

Nibble

Deciding on the Advisory Role,rs. Such decisions involve selection of material. They also involve choosing between possible frames and communicative and rhetorical instruments. The selective role of the scientific advisor is larger when he is confronted with policy problems that are unstructured.

完全

Tinea-Capitis

angiography

Solving the Issue by Introducing Principles and Procedures,ian and deontological traditions to provide guiding principles for scientific advisors. This approach has its values but also must confront two sorts of problems. One sort of problem concerns the application of the principles; the other the choice between different principles.

FLING

Solving the Issue by Bringing Virtue Ethics into Play,al scientific virtues and another that focusses on practical wisdom (phronesis) that is at home in politics. A third approach that builds on MacIntyre’s notion of practices is introduced to integrate the two, leading to the idea of the academic citizen.

600

Outshine

978-3-319-87984-0The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018