Titlebook: Value and the World Economy Today; Production, Finance Richard Westra,Alan Zuege Book 2003 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Pub

漫不經(jīng)心

Robert Albrittont some point in this successive partitioning we reach the level of atomic mental activities—“elementary information processes,” as Newell and Simon (1972) call them—which cannot themselves be decomposed within a cognitive framework. Exactly which activities one takes as atomic depends on one’s theor

注意

DIKE

The Rationality and Irrationality of Moneys of money constrain and undermine national governments and daily determine the fate of billions of people. The privileges of the few and the want of the many are determined by their respective possession and their lack of money. Yet where are we to find the social theory of money? How does money ac

MOAT

Value, Finance and Social Classeser to analyze the role finance really plays in capitalism, we have to study its economic roots. How is it that people can make money from money? Which social groups are becoming wealthy in this manner? We need a theory of value not only to formulate proper answers to these questions, but even to ask

嬰兒

Globalization: The Retreat of Capital to the ‘Interstices’ of the World?n in this chapter is that the fault resides with a gapping lacuna in the research agendas of globalization: that is, as we shall see, while current analysis of globalization has been deeply fixated upon questions of the relative force of states and world ‘markets’ in shaping the economic future, it

rectocele

無(wú)所不知

Bucket

Some Critical Reflections on Marx’s Theory of Value be willing to give anything in exchange for these items. Such items, as we all know, have ‘sentimental value’ but no ‘economic value.’ Value in its economic sense is a . of the ‘worth’ of a thing. It is an . in the sense that a thing’s worth is not measured by individual subjectivity but by the obj

忍受

Hyaluronic-Acid

Marx’s Value Theory and Subjectivityof subjectivity (Barrett 1991: 110). This failure becomes all the more glaring in light of current preoccupations with theories of subjectivity usually informed by some combination of psychoanalytic, phenomenological, or poststructuralist currents of thought. The reading of Marx’s . is neglected the