Titlebook: Value and the Humanities; The Neoliberal Unive Zoe Hope Bulaitis Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2020 neo

adulation

書目名稱Value and the Humanities影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Value and the Humanities影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Value and the Humanities網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Value and the Humanities網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Value and the Humanities被引頻次




書目名稱Value and the Humanities被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Value and the Humanities年度引用




書目名稱Value and the Humanities年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Value and the Humanities讀者反饋




書目名稱Value and the Humanities讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Torrid

A History of Payment by Results: , (1862) and the , (2010),is chapter also observes how the prioritisation of individualism in higher education raises the potential for liberal values to be reinstated in the direct relationship between the university and individual students.

Neonatal

Controversy and Conversation: The Relationship Between the Humanities and the Sciences,exchange serves as a reminder of the many values that scientists and humanities scholars share. The chapter recognises the significance of both . the humanities are represented and . it is that articulates values within and outside of higher education.

Aesthete

Instantaneous

pericardium

Impact and the Humanities: The Rise of Accountability in Public Cultural Life,nterests and regulated through mechanisms of accountability and assessment of public impact. The chapter draws from critical scholarship in the field of museology in order to provide a language with which humanities scholars can address the contemporary changes facing research assessment culture in higher education.

蔑視

Conclusion, conclusion to ‘Value and the Humanities’ calls upon scholars to engage in articulations of value that reflect their disciplines. In the present moment, with the rise of populist thinking, this book concludes with the acknowledgement of the vital need for the reinvigoration of articulations of value.

反抗者

Introduction,ity studies, the public value of the humanities, and social impact work. This chapter defines the contemporary period discussed in the book (2008–18) as being predominantly economically minded in terms of educational policymaking. This chapter presents the overarching methodology of this book, in dr

船員

asthma

Controversy and Conversation: The Relationship Between the Humanities and the Sciences, are fundamentally in opposition, I propose a more nuanced history of these disciplines. This is achieved through investigating the discourse between the sciences and the humanities through examples of cross-disciplinary debate. Returning to the Snow-Leavis debate reveals how rhetorical intervention