找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Validating Psychological Constructs; Historical, Philosop Kathleen Slaney Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 Co

[復制鏈接]
查看: 52762|回復: 46
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:07:06 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Validating Psychological Constructs
副標題Historical, Philosop
編輯Kathleen Slaney
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/981/980261/980261.mp4
概述Explores the history and development of construct validity theory (CVT) in relation to the broader domain of psychological measurement.Critically examines CVT in a broader context.Brings together hist
叢書名稱Palgrave Studies in the Theory and History of Psychology
圖書封面Titlebook: Validating Psychological Constructs; Historical, Philosop Kathleen Slaney Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 Co
描述This book critically examines the historical and philosophical foundations of construct validity theory (CVT), and how these have and continue to inform and constrain the conceptualization of validity and its application in research. CVT has had an immense impact on how researchers in the behavioural sciences conceptualize and approach their subject matter. Yet, there is equivocation regarding the foundations of the CVT framework as well as ambiguities concerning the nature of the “constructs” that are its raison d’etre. The book is organized in terms of three major parts that speak, respectively, to the historical, philosophical, and pragmatic dimensions of CVT. The primary objective is to provide researchers and students with a critical lens through which a deeper understanding may be gained of both the utility and limitations of CVT and the validation practices to which it has given rise.?
出版日期Book 2017
關(guān)鍵詞Construct Validity Theory; Classical Test Theory; Modern Test Theory; Loevinger; Spearman; Philosophy of
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-38523-9
isbn_softcover978-1-349-67805-1
isbn_ebook978-1-137-38523-9Series ISSN 2946-2452 Series E-ISSN 2946-2460
issn_series 2946-2452
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Validating Psychological Constructs影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Validating Psychological Constructs影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Validating Psychological Constructs網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Validating Psychological Constructs網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Validating Psychological Constructs被引頻次




書目名稱Validating Psychological Constructs被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Validating Psychological Constructs年度引用




書目名稱Validating Psychological Constructs年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Validating Psychological Constructs讀者反饋




書目名稱Validating Psychological Constructs讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:44:14 | 只看該作者
Introduction,construct’ concept and the ripple effects of its introduction into the psychological literature from the late 1940s to early 1950s. The chapter also provides a description of important discrepancies in the published literature concerning both the ‘construct’ concept and the utility of CVT as a valid
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:29:11 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:01:32 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:41:06 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:07:54 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:03:32 | 只看該作者
The Philosophical Backdrop of Construct Validityportant developments in the philosophy of science from the mid-1920s to the early 1960s. Emphasis is placed on the distinction between logical positivism and scientific realism and on key areas of difference between them. Also described is the transition between the heavily empiricist doctrines of l
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:36:52 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:10:55 | 只看該作者
Some Conceptual Housecleaningluding the ever-evasive ‘construct’ concept and its progenitor, the ‘hypothetical construct.’ The various ontological stances that have been adopted regarding constructs are summarized. Concrete examples of confusing or otherwise ambiguous uses of these terms are given, and a common but pernicious t
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:39:22 | 只看該作者
Construct Validation: View from the “Trenches”1990s to current. The chapter then shifts in focus from scholarship . how to validate constructs to a description of construct validation research . lived and practiced. The major findings from a fairly recent body of empirical research dedicated to the examination of psychometric reporting and vali
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 03:42
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
沛县| 沾化县| 长武县| 珠海市| 湖州市| 乌审旗| 平舆县| 罗定市| 莱阳市| 清水河县| 冷水江市| 阿鲁科尔沁旗| 丰都县| 武威市| 潮州市| 房产| 佛冈县| 杭锦旗| 奉节县| 永安市| 信丰县| 深州市| 滁州市| 林周县| 望江县| 道孚县| 石门县| 安丘市| 祁阳县| 郯城县| 广水市| 岳池县| 诸暨市| 灵宝市| 商水县| 大竹县| 巴中市| 溆浦县| 政和县| 高唐县| 平顶山市|