Titlebook: User-friendly Legal Science; A New Scientific Dis Petri M?ntysaari Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 2017 Legal theory.Legal m

風(fēng)俗習(xí)慣

書目名稱User-friendly Legal Science影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱User-friendly Legal Science影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱User-friendly Legal Science網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱User-friendly Legal Science網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱User-friendly Legal Science被引頻次




書目名稱User-friendly Legal Science被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱User-friendly Legal Science年度引用




書目名稱User-friendly Legal Science年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱User-friendly Legal Science讀者反饋




書目名稱User-friendly Legal Science讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

平庸的人或物

The Research Question, Theories and Methods,s and methods. In User-friendly Legal Science, the choice of the research question, the theoretical framework and the methods must reflect the discipline’s particular characteristics. There are fundamental differences between User-friendly Legal Science and other areas of legal science in this respe

Misnomer

燈絲

Previous Attempts to Increase the Scientificity of Legal Science,osite of law and economics. It has more in common with legal history and comparative law. The purpose of this chapter is to study the earlier approaches in order to learn more about what is new about User-friendly Legal Science.

悲觀

Anomalies of Normal Legal Science, Applications of User-Friendly Legal Science,framework of User-friendly Legal Science. Moreover, User-friendly Legal Science can help to address some anomalies of normal legal science. This chapter shows that legal rhetoric, international law and commercial law are anomalies that can be defined as scientific disciplines within the framework of

Ankylo-

委派

ne’s research approach, point of view, theory-building, and research methods, it also shows how it relates to other scientific disciplines and how existing doctrinal legal disciplines can be upgraded into scientific disciplines..978-3-319-85165-5978-3-319-53492-3

aspect

The Research Question, Theories and Methods,ine’s particular characteristics. There are fundamental differences between User-friendly Legal Science and other areas of legal science in this respect. These differences reflect the unique point of view of User-friendly Legal Science.

BLAZE

Use of Findings,ns to reach them. The findings can therefore be used in many ways in legal research. Moreover, the findings can be used in many pragmatic ways by the users of legal tools and practices. In legal education, the findings can contribute to a more practice-ready curriculum.

匍匐前進(jìn)