Titlebook: Universities and the Europe of Knowledge; Ideas, Institutions Anne Corbett Book 2005 Anne Corbett 2005 Bologna process.education.education

壓倒

Origins: The Proposal for a European Community University, 1955–57place at which between June 1 and the dawn of June 3, 1955, the crucial first step took place to create the European Economic Community (EEC) and the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom). The governments of Belgium, France, the Federal Republic of Germany, Italy, Luxembourg and the Netherlands

Cardiac-Output

碌碌之人

Flustered

Stabilising the Policy Domain, 1973–76was a developing law and — not coterminous and rather ambiguous — a developing common education policy based not on binding law, but on public international law or Community ‘soft law’.. But on the basis of this account they can more accurately be seen as the years in which for the first time a reso

Deceit

shrill

Attaining a Goal: The Erasmus Decision, 1985–87the installation in January 1985 of a new Commission, under the presidency of the dynamic French politician, Jacques Delors. But that event was itself the culmination of many others. This chapter recounts the process by which broad support for a full EC decision on higher education was gained, and h

過多

調(diào)情

Conclusions challenge the dominant assumption of the literature that such policy-making has evolved through ‘Community creep’ and, specifically, rulings of the European Court of Justice (ECJ). It is not that I deny the role of the Court, and the opportunities which its rulings provided for institutional policy

輕浮女

Epilogue The Europe of Knowledge: A Renewed European Ambitiony on from the initial efforts by leading individuals within the EC to establish a Community university, and a decade and half after the Erasmus Decision of 1987, 41 governments within Europe are committed to modifying national systems to create a common academic space to be known as the European Hig

表兩個

Book 2005background narrative to current strategic efforts to develop the Europe of Knowledge, and to the Bologna Process. Its analytic interest in ideas and individual ‘policy entrepreneurs‘ underpins the story and advances understanding of the EU policy process and of the phenomenon of policy entrepreneurs