Titlebook: Universalizability; A Study in Morals an W?odzimierz Rabinowicz Book 1979 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1979 15th centur

HAG

書目名稱Universalizability影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Universalizability影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Universalizability網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Universalizability網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Universalizability被引頻次




書目名稱Universalizability被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Universalizability年度引用




書目名稱Universalizability年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Universalizability讀者反饋




書目名稱Universalizability讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

恫嚇

Theory of Automorphismsn individual, then by . we shall understand the set of all worlds in which a exists, i.e., {.∈.: .∈.}. Letters ., ., ., .,… shall stand for individuals (=members of .), and we shall refer to the members of A as ., ., .,….

脫落

Introductionrtain situation, ., it ought to be the case that certain goods are transferred from one person to another, then this moral obligation does not depend on the individual identities of the persons involved.

DOTE

放肆的你

Theory of Automorphismsst in ., and the set A of automorphisms. We shall write ‘.w’ sinstead of ‘.(w)’ and we shall often use the symbol ‘.’ in order to refer to the set of all individuals which exist in one world or another. Thus, ‘.’ shall frequently represent the union of all values of the existence-function. If . is a

斜谷

合法

Universality and Universalizability.}.) Thus, the deontic closure of . is the proposition true in exactly those worlds in which . is obligatory. In other words, the deontic closure of . is nothing other than the proposition that . is obligatory.

籠子

Extensions of Leibnizianism . to .. Such a reduction must consist in the derivation of the condition (.), according to which . includes .. This is sufficient, because the converse of this condition trivially follows from any variant of D 10.3. Before we start searching for such extensions of Leibnizianism, let us recall that

genesis

Leibnizianism Once Againin a situation can never be replaced without changing some of the universal aspects of the situation. Leibnizianism amounts to the claim that individual differences between situations always imply some universal differences. To put it formally, for any ., .?., and any individual .?. such that .?. an

多產(chǎn)子

Book 1979ll understand it, this principle represents a claim that moral properties of things (persons, actions, state of affairs, situations) are essentially independent of their purely ‘individual‘ or-as one often says -‘numerical‘ aspects. l Thus, if a thing, x, is better than another thing, y, then this f