Titlebook: Universal Logic, Ethics, and Truth; Essays in Honor of J Timothy J. Madigan,Jean-Yves Béziau Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and Th

AMUSE

書目名稱Universal Logic, Ethics, and Truth影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Universal Logic, Ethics, and Truth影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Universal Logic, Ethics, and Truth網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Universal Logic, Ethics, and Truth網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Universal Logic, Ethics, and Truth被引頻次




書目名稱Universal Logic, Ethics, and Truth被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Universal Logic, Ethics, and Truth年度引用




書目名稱Universal Logic, Ethics, and Truth年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Universal Logic, Ethics, and Truth讀者反饋




書目名稱Universal Logic, Ethics, and Truth讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

locus-ceruleus

,Hugh MacColl and Christine Ladd-Franklin: 1877–1909,incredible that English logicians should not have seen that the entire task accomplished by Boole has been accomplished by Maccoll [sic.] with far greater conciseness, simplicity and elegance.” Examining some of her work and the work of her contemporaries, I explore the possible reasons she had for holding this opinion.

BOLUS

Introduction: John Corcoran as a Teacher, Mentor, and Friend,th considerable fear and trembling. Logic had never been a strong point of mine, and John’s reputation on campus was that of a fierce taskmaster. Little did I realize at the time that I would not only love the course, but that it would have a profound impact upon my own thinking and teaching right u

弄臟

,Hugh MacColl and Christine Ladd-Franklin: 1877–1909,h centuries. Together with George Boole, Augustus De Morgan, William Stanley Jevons, Charles S. Peirce, Ernst Schr?der, John Venn, Christine Ladd-Franklin and others, MacColl considered logic as a calculus represented by the algebra of logic. In an article published in 1889 in ., Ladd-Franklin wrote

才能

Ex Incompatibilitate Sequitur Quodlibet (The Explosiveness of Incompatibility and the Compatibilityy setting out a framework about consequence relation and truth. We proceed by presenting the basic concepts of the theory of opposition and the meaning of contradiction according to this theory. We then introduce the notion of incompatibility, and, on the basis of that, we deal with explosion and in

增減字母法

使迷醉

蒙太奇

MOTTO

Logical Hylomorphism Revisited: Aristotle, Tarski, and Corcoran,odels of logical hylomorphism. Substantial hylomorphism considers logic as a theory of higher-order formal objects which turns their properties into rules of inference. Dynamic hylomorphism concerns goals-directed and rules-governed structured actions of reasoning agents rather than objects. The pap

拖網(wǎng)