Titlebook: Unequal Partners; American Foundations Fabrice Jaumont Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 Foundation.Africa.Hig

果園

書目名稱Unequal Partners影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Unequal Partners影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Unequal Partners網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Unequal Partners網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Unequal Partners被引頻次




書目名稱Unequal Partners被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Unequal Partners年度引用




書目名稱Unequal Partners年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Unequal Partners讀者反饋




書目名稱Unequal Partners讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

積習(xí)已深

vocation

The Discourse on Priorities Among Donorsboration through the rhetoric of capacity building and high-impact investment. This rhetoric had a huge impact on the grantmaking strategies and funding priorities of the Partnership, framing the individual and collective ambitions of the foundations while rallying foundation representatives around a common goal.

爭論

antenna

Century-Old Philanthropic Interests in Africa’s Higher Educationversities in the early twentieth century. An overview of the historical relationship between American philanthropies and institutions of higher learning on the African continent establishes parallels with private foundations’ investment in American higher education throughout the twentieth century.

Resign

爭論

Foundations Come with Institutional Culturesd by a foundation’s charter and enforced by various bureaucratic processes, certain aspects of a foundation’s institutional culture are also internalized by personnel, thereby having a major impact on the way these actors respond to a given situation even on an individual level. Similar institutiona

阻止

When Foundations Work Togethereverage funds in order to tackle large-scale issues that they would be unable to impact individually. The PHEA, for example, hoped to transform the higher education system of an entire continent. This level of collaboration implies sharing processes and mechanisms, and lays the groundwork for instit

Aviary

依法逮捕

The Legitimacy of American Foundationsnd other legitimacy-granting organizations. One way to leverage reputation and legitimacy is through strategic, high-impact partnerships such as the PHEA. However, many scholars question the legitimacy of international philanthropy, arguing that the decision-making process is undemocratic and behold